King Charles makes vow amid Andrew and Epstein scandal as Buckingham Palace issues new statement

King Charles makes vow amid Andrew and Epstein scandal as Buckingham Palace issues new statement

Prince William and Kate, Princess of Wales, have broken their silence through Kensington Palace as scrutiny around Prince Andrew’s links to Jeffrey Epstein continues to intensify. King Charles has also issued a separate response via Buckingham Palace.

Until now, the Prince and Princess of Wales had not publicly commented on the renewed attention surrounding William’s uncle, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, following the release of additional Epstein-related files. Andrew’s long-standing association with the late convicted sex offender has drawn public criticism for years, but that scrutiny increased sharply last month after millions of documents connected to Epstein and his crimes were made public.

Among the material released were images said to show Andrew kneeling on all fours above an unidentified woman lying on the ground. No context has been provided for the images, and it remains unclear when or where they were taken.

William and Kate respond through Kensington Palace

On Monday, ahead of Prince William’s official visit to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Kensington Palace issued a statement on behalf of both William and Kate.

Speaking to reporters in the capital, a spokesperson said that “the Prince and Princess of Wales have been deeply concerned by the continuing revelations. Their thoughts remain focused on the victims.”

According to ITV, sources close to William were keen to ensure there was “zero doubt” about where he stands on the matter. The focus, they said, remains firmly on those who have suffered, rather than on the wider royal fallout.

King Charles addresses the situation

Later the same day, Buckingham Palace released a statement reflecting King Charles’ position on the ongoing scandal.

“The king has made clear, both in words and through unprecedented actions, his profound concern at allegations which continue to come to light in respect of Mr Mountbatten-Windsor’s conduct,” the statement said.

It continued: “While the specific claims are for Mr Mountbatten-Windsor to address, if Thames Valley Police were to approach us, we would stand ready to support them as expected. Their Majesties’ thoughts and sympathies have been, and remain, with the victims of all forms of abuse.”

The comments followed remarks made last week by Prince Edward, Andrew’s youngest brother, during a visit to Dubai. He told reporters that it was vital to remember “who the victims are in all of this.”

Ongoing allegations and royal fallout

The Epstein scandal has dominated headlines in recent days, with renewed attention also falling on Andrew’s former wife, Sarah Ferguson.

Last week, Andrew reportedly vacated Royal Lodge in Windsor as pressure continued to mount. Buckingham Palace had previously announced in October that he would be leaving the property after more than two decades, alongside confirmation that his remaining royal titles and honours would be removed.

Andrew’s ties to Epstein have followed him for years. In his 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, he claimed he had cut contact with Epstein in late 2010, following the financier’s 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor. However, emails that later emerged appeared to suggest contact between the two continued into early 2011.

Andrew has also faced allegations of sexual assault. Virginia Giuffre has alleged that she was trafficked by Epstein and made to have sex with Andrew on three occasions when she was 17. Andrew has consistently and strongly denied those claims.

Last month, following the release of further Epstein files, a second woman came forward with allegations. She claimed she was sent to the UK by Epstein for a sexual encounter with Andrew at Royal Lodge in 2010. Andrew has not publicly responded to these latest claims.

His representatives have declined to comment. Andrew continues to deny any wrongdoing related to Epstein. Being named or appearing in Epstein-related files does not, in itself, constitute evidence of criminal conduct.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *